Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 08:49

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
All international travelers should get measles vaccine, CDC says - OregonLive.com
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thanks to FIFA, Atlanta’s first-ever Club World Cup game was underwhelming - AJC.com
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Carnival Cruise Line pledges greater cruise loyalty benefits - TheStreet
What’s next?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
How do you recognize when your mental health might need attention?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Nearly complete dinosaur skull reveals a new sauropod species from East Asia - Phys.org
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Kyle Busch, Josh Berry go sliding in practice at Nashville - NASCAR.com
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Hunter Dobbins Has Last Laugh In War Of Words With Yankees - NESN
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
WhatsApp backs Apple in its legal row with the UK over user data - BBC
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Which country has the best and strictest legal system in the world?